Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages?
On Sat, Dec 20 1997 16:17 +1100 Hamish Moffatt writes:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 1997 at 01:31:38PM -0500, Scott Ellis wrote:
> > And the instant someone provides us with free software equivilant to ssh
> > or pgp, we'll move to use it. We need the functionality, unfortunatly
> > sometimes you have to use what you can get.
>
> Hmmm. Perhaps this is a flaw in the non-US section,
> or at least the perception of it (or mine at very least). I had
> assumed that non-US meant otherwise free, which having just
> read the copyrights for ssh and pgp, I see is not the case ..
Isn't the hamm non-us section split into non-free and hamm ?
I thought, this was the consensus, since non-us only means
`not to be (re-)exported from the US'.
David
Reply to: