Re: additional virtual packages for kde
On Thu, Nov 27, 1997 at 12:17:47AM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> short term solution
> ===================
>
> my solution (two virtual names) is meant to be a short term solution.
> all i want is, to inform you and to give you the possibility to offer me
^^^^^^
> a better short term solution.
I thought that policy required discussion, not just notification.
I realise that we have had discussion but no consensus has been
reached; therefore, you should not go ahead and use your
virtual package names.
> kde is the first and only case with this problem. the current case was
> never discussed before, so i do not consider the policy authorative.
> as maintainer my decission is authorative.
Only after discussion (& presumably agreement) about the virtual
package names.
> project goals need long discussions. i need a solution now, and
> everything you showed didn't impress me. i will obey any decission,
> that will be done.
What is wrong with Christian's final solution? You didn't reply.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, StudIEAust hamish@debian.org, hmoffatt@mail.com
Student, computer science & computer systems engineering. 3rd year, RMIT.
http://hamish.home.ml.org/ (PGP key here) CPOM: [****** ] 60%
If you get a wrong answer, multiply by the page number. Especially in CO305.
Reply to: