Re: Policy Weekly Issue #4/4: Announcing new packages before uploading them
Hi,
>>"Joey" == Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> writes:
Joey> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> -%mapkv=(); # for future use
>> +%mapkv=("Closes" => "Bugs_closed"); # for future use
>> $i=100;grep($fieldimps{$_}=$i--,
>> - qw(Source Version Distribution Urgency Maintainer Date Changes));
>> + qw(Source Version Distribution Urgency Maintainer
>> + Bugs_closed Date Changes));
Joey> Gee, I just love duplicated work, don't you? At least we hit
Joey> upon the same change, more or less. :-)
Joey> I think it's cleaner to map "Closes" => "Closes" , there is no
Joey> real need to rename it to Bugs_closed. None of the other fields
Joey> in the control or change log file have their name change that
Joey> way.
By all means, lets use Closed. I still want to reorder the
order of the fields, though; I think that the Closed header should
come before the Date and the Changes fields (the fieldimps
associateve array)
Joey> I don't object to using bugs_closes= instead of closes=, but I
Joey> would like to see the same name used consitently throughout.
Sure. I changed the name because I *like* how easy it was to
map names ;-).
manoj
--
"The Government just announced today the creation of the Neutron Bomb
II. Similar to the Neutron Bomb, the Neutron Bomb II not only kills
people and leaves buildings standing, but also does a little light
housekeeping." from "Global Village News" on Nickelodeon
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: