Re: New filesystem standard - do we want it ?

[Santiago Vila Doncel <sanvila@unex.es>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Fabrizio Polacco wrote:
> Lalo Martins wrote:
> > Maybe we could come up with a "transition path" - like moving
> > stuff like /usr/doc (less prone to make the system break) and
> > then symlinking "ln -s /usr/share/doc /usr/doc"
> 
> Yes, make this symlink (ln -s ../share/doc /usr/doc) on freshly
> installed systems (where /usr/share/docs will really exist), while 
> make the opposite (ln -s ../../doc /usr/share/doc) on existing systems 
> (where /usr/doc is still there).

Please, do not make any symlink.

dpkg might get confused when removing a package if a directory
uncompresses on a symlink-pointing-to-a-directory.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1

iQCVAgUBNFSCcyqK7IlOjMLFAQENRQP+OH4sBRx3LK2SYUm07NxF7y0CUtL6c6e5
C0gO7DHbdCBtBd/Dn1TEOE85IRu33CNz0zTku5EHSc1m2/cEyeBZvZZgqIgQlwfr
pObF/nKhaQNwJmeThqqtIgmE0qGJYNnGq8JdJ0Ee+zh4DBxGTbbh5FMURP1FOk5w
owJH70qYcZI=
=NRFR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----