Re: New filesystem standard - do we want it ?
- To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: New filesystem standard - do we want it ?
- From: "Lalo Martins" <lalo@webcom.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 00:12:15 -0200
- Message-id: <19971027001215.19698@lalo>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.971026165313.8321E-100000@monet>; from Christian Schwarz on Sun, Oct 26, 1997 at 05:10:04PM +0100
- References: <E0xPTz0-0004Zk-00@davenant.greenend.org.uk> <Pine.LNX.3.96.971026165313.8321E-100000@monet>
On Oct 26, Christian Schwarz decided to present us with:
[...]
> I suggest to implement FHS 2.0 with a few exceptions _after_ hamm (2.0)
> is released. Until then, we can discuss the different changes in detail
> and decide which parts of the FHS we'll drop.
I suggest we make FHS 2.0 [with or without exceptions] a feature
for debian 2.1. We already have trouble enought with libc6.
Maybe we could come up with a "transition path" - like moving
stuff like /usr/doc (less prone to make the system break) and
then symlinking "ln -s /usr/share/doc /usr/doc"
[]s,
|alo
+----
--
I walk the maze of moments...
http://www.webcom.com/lalo mailto:lalo@webcom.com
On BrasIRC: Akaa pgp key in the web page
Free Software Union -- http://www.fslu.org
Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org
***** for Portuguese speakers only: *****
NCO (quadrinhos) -- http://www.connect.com.br/nco
Reply to: