Re: Policy Weekly Issue #4/16: New source package format
Hi,
I think this topic (choosing packages which were supposed to
be installed) has come up before, and there was a list of packages
floating around; however, choosing required, important, and standard
packages should also do it.
That means, currently, 133 packages (from the available file
on my machine). So, any port to a new architecture would have to
bootstrap by porting these packages by other means. A smaller set
could doubtless be assembled, but maintaining that list is likely to
be more cumbersome than this simple rule.
manoj
__> egrep ^Priority /var/lib/dpkg/available | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
17 Priority: important
45 Priority: required
71 Priority: standard
187 Priority: extra
1217 Priority: optional
--
People beset by desire run here and there, like a snared rabbit, so
one should get rid of one's craving if it is freedom from desire that
one wants. 343
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: