Policy Weekly Issue #4/11: UUCP-locking of devices
- To: Debian Policy <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Policy Weekly Issue #4/11: UUCP-locking of devices
- From: Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 22:59:44 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.96.971023225929.17246S-100000@monet>
Topic 11: UUCP-locking of devices
STATE: INPUT
REF: cf. bug #11094 and #10575
The FSSTND (as well as the FHS draft) specifies how programs have to lock
UUCP devices. Unfortunately, the locking mechanism has several flaws.
To solve this dilemma, Fabrizio Polacco built a library for device locking
(liblockdev) which is fully compliant to the FSSTND requirements but also
solves some problems of the locking mechanism.
I suggest to change policy so that every Debian package has to use
liblockdev to lock/unlock devices.
Any comments are appreciated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ schwarz@monet.m.isar.de, schwarz@schwarz-online.com,
! ___; schwarz@debian.org, schwarz@mathematik.tu-muenchen.de
\ /
\\\______/ ! PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
\ / http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
-.-.,---,-,-..---,-,-.,----.-.-
"DIE ENTE BLEIBT DRAUSSEN!"
Reply to: