Re: #12501: zip and unzip are non-free
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[I'm moving this to debian-policy]
On 1 Oct 1997, Guy Maor wrote:
> Santiago Vila Doncel <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
>
> > [About zip and unzip moved to non-free]
> >
> > They are still in bo (main).
> > I'm going to reopen this bug.
>
> There were a _lot_ of package movements besides this one in hamm.
> Must I duplicate them all in bo?
I those movements are like the zip/unzip one, I think so. Otherwise we can
not claim that Debian 1.3.1 r"whatever" is fully DFSG-compliant.
> Perhaps it's reasonable to keep the old definitions of non-free/contrib
> for bo (the READMEs there still refer to the old definitions), and to
> use the new definitions only for hamm?
This would be, of course, the easiest solution. But: would we doing the
right thing? Debian 1.3.1 is still being sold on CDs.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNDJufCqK7IlOjMLFAQGv/gP/b0ddm9K1guuXu05e16g1/nBSVg9EFGvR
J9hcPPyRZhjhTH/N2MO3wOxBb7DP586wlwLs9rsowKt9SMnG9qZ/dfJ4eI8CrjDl
ISngVnYftENgNa+hgKAlj9acN01HIXC5APzWxqXJoHE7QOsos7l1mZbN6LneTxVv
iAcMczI6aAg=
=IMcZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: