On 2019-02-23 19:44, gregor herrmann wrote: > I see that the package is ready in git; are we sure that this patch, > which I threw together quickly some years ago, is correct (beyond > making the build+test pass)? The patch seems to be correct to me. The changes are really minimal, but fully enough to cover the minor differences between the APIs of csnappy and snappy-c (AFAIK). If it gives more confidence, the built package successfully pass integration tests with Cache::FastMmap, although it's not much more than a roundtrip with long random strings. Best, Andrius -- Andrius Merkys Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325 LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature