Re: Reverted "fix lintian patch-file-present-but-not-mentioned-in-series warning" in libembperl-perl
Hello Axel
Many apologies for this mistake, I've tried to make this warning
disappear on all perl packages and you're absolutely right, i missed
this point
In fact, I stupidly assumed that lintian-overrides was considered in
the detection of this warning
Again, all my apologies :(
Regards
On 9/29/18, Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> I just reverted your commit "fix lintian
> patch-file-present-but-not-mentioned-in-series warning" in
> libembperl-perl (and will push the revert soon after this mail).
>
> This patch is deliberately present but not in debian/patches/series.
> See the most recent debian/changelog entry:
>
> * Add lintian override for delay.patch not being enabled by
> default. It's only present for use by porters on very slow
> buildds.
>
> See also the mentioned override in debian/source/lintian-overrides:
>
> # Optional patch for porters only needed on very slow buildds
> libembperl-perl source: patch-file-present-but-not-mentioned-in-series
> delay.patch
>
> So I'm not sure why you thought that—despite that explicit
> override—this lintian warning needs fixing.
>
> Regards, Axel
> --
> ,''`. | Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
> : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
> `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
> `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
>
Reply to: