[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#854341: libchado-perl: FTBFS: The following enviroment variables not detected: CHADO_DB_USERNAME





Le mar. 14 févr. 2017 à 08:36, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> a écrit :
tags 854341 help
thanks

Hi,

I admit I have no idea how to fix this.  Help from people with
Perl background would be really appreciated.
 
I just made a build attempt (1-31-3) with pbuilder, updated right before build, based on latest svn source and it built fine 
Onyl difference is make -j4 for you and make -j1 for me (automatic update by debhelper?)

Olivier

On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 03:40:09PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> ...
>
> I'm running later into
>
> ...
>    dh_auto_install -O--buildsystem=perl_makemaker
>         make -j4 install DESTDIR=/build/libchado-perl-1.31/debian/tmp AM_UPDATE_INFO_DIR=no PREFIX=/usr
> make[1]: Entering directory '/build/libchado-perl-1.31'
> "/usr/bin/perl" "/build/libchado-perl-1.31/install_util/conf_install.pl" 'GMOD_ROOT=/build/libchado-perl-1.31/debian/libchado-perl/usr/share/gmod/chado' 'VERSION=1.31'
> "/usr/bin/perl" "/build/libchado-perl-1.31/install_util/src_install.pl" 'GMOD_ROOT=/build/libchado-perl-1.31/debian/libchado-perl/usr/share/gmod/chado'
> couldn't open /build/libchado-perl-1.31/debian/libchado-perl/usr/share/gmod/chado/conf directory for reading:No such file or directory
> Makefile:1222: recipe for target 'src_install' failed
>
>
> which is pretty strange since
>
> # ls -l /build/libchado-perl-1.31/debian/libchado-perl/usr/share/gmod/chado/conf
> total 8
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 221 Feb  6 11:06 gmod-chado.conf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 167 Feb  6 11:06 gmod.conf
>
>
>
> > Glancing quickly at Makefile.PL and debian/rules it looks like the
> > variable names have changed (eg. was DBUSER, etc.).
>
> The variable names have not changed in any recent upload and as you can
> see DBUSER etc are used.
>
> Does anybody else have some idea?

Kind regards

       Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to: