Re: Bug#735134: perl: rename(1) is ancient
- To: 735134@bugs.debian.org, debian-perl@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#735134: perl: rename(1) is ancient
- From: Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 22:04:03 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20160502210403.GB24165@urchin.earth.li>
- In-reply-to: <20150824215326.GX11816@urchin.earth.li>
- References: <20140112235410.7150.99481.reportbug@eudyptes> <20140114203428.GA14615@estella.local.invalid> <20140114205904.GI8057@rzlab.ucr.edu> <20140118153429.GF26815@urchin.earth.li> <20140202151231.GO26815@urchin.earth.li> <20140505145105.GZ23404@urchin.earth.li> <20140506095807.GA6337@sym.noone.org> <20150818212156.GM11816@urchin.earth.li> <20150821165401.GQ9970@sym.noone.org> <20150824215326.GX11816@urchin.earth.li>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:53:26PM +0200, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 06:54:01PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > JFYI: I feel that this search wasn't sufficient. I miss at least two
> > packages co-maintained by myself and missing in that list: xymon and
> > hobbit-plugins:
> Okay. I think I put too much faith in codesearch.debian.org giving me
> complete results. I'll look again.
Given that codesearch wasn't reliable enough, I had a look at a lintian
check; but I think it's going to be almost impossible to come up with
a check which is accurate; it's either going to end up with too many
false negatives, or too many false positives. As an alternative, how
would people feel about just patching the current rename with a
deprecation warning for one release cycle, and removing it from the perl
package in stretch + 1?
Cheers,
Dominic.
Reply to: