Re: Proposal of minimal split of libconfig-model-perl

[gregor herrmann <gregoa@debian.org>]

On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 18:33:07 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:

> After some discussion on #debian-perl, I've decided to reduce the scope of the 
> package split.
> 
> App::Cme will be spun of Config::Model upstream (doing the split upstream will 
> give more visibility to cme outside of Debian).
> 
> App::Cme will contain cme and bash_completion files

Sounds good to me.
 
> On Debian side, cme package will depend on libconfig-model-perl and  recommend 
> or suggest the packages containing models (like libconfig-model-dpkg-perl).

I'd go for Recommends for the "important" ones.
Hm, or maybe even Depends for libconfig-model-dpkg-perl, since that's
what most packagers will actually need/want when they install/run cme.

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   BOFH excuse #116:  the real ttys became pseudo ttys and vice-versa.