On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:47:44 +0000, Daniel Lintott wrote: > First off I have to say thanks to gregor for all his help the past > couple of days, I have been made to feel very welcome in the group and > have already learnt a lot! You're welcome. And thanks to you for working on updating our packages, much appreciated. > Now onto the real stuff: > > TODO: > - the real problem is that two of the upstream release drop half of > the formerly included modules. I guess we have to check that > nothing else needs them, or package them separately (with nice > Replaces+Breaks in the new packages and Depends or Recommends here) > > What is the best way to go about this? That's indeed not completely trivial. Another option than checking dependencies would be to use http://codesearch.debian.net/ and check for SHARYANTO:: or something more clever there. > I have found one package that depends on libsharyanto-utils-perl using > the following: > > > # apt-cache rdepends libsharyanto-utils-perl > > libsharyanto-utils-perl Reverse Depends: libfile-write-rotate-perl > > The module in question that this package requires (File::Flock) has > been split from libsharyanto-utils-perl and is available in: > > SHARYANTO-File-Util-0.56 File-related utilities > > which will require packaging. Ok, that's a nice catch. > Looking at all of the SHARYANTO-* modules on metacpan, there are > several other moudles not currently packed... And I guess we don't want to package them all unless they are really needed :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: John Zorn: Shevet (Ribot)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature