[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Removal candidates



As discussed several times before, we might look into removing
packages from the archive, which have RC bugs since ages with no fix
in sight.

I'm trying to compile a list of potential candidates by going over
http://pet.debian.net/pkg-perl/pet.cgi

/* Cf. also
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianPerlGroup/OpenTasks#Release-critical_bugs
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint=pkg-perl-maintainers%40lists.alioth.debian.org;include=tags%3Awheezy;severity=serious;severity=grave;severity=critical;exclude=tags%3Awheezy-ignore
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=perl-5.20-transition;users=debian-perl@lists.debian.org
*/

libcatalyst-engine-psgi-perl
#759960: FTBFS recently

libcatalyst-plugin-email-perl
#748849: depends on removed module Email::Send
no upstream reaction: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=86843
Popcon vote: 6
no rdeps
not in testing

libclone-fast-perl
#750229: FTBFS with 5.20
deprecated upstream etc.
Popcon vote: 2
no rdeps
not in testing

libdbd-oracle-perl
#759324: needs manual rebuilds, which are a pain
contrib, needs non-free oracle libs
Popcon vote: 42
Rdeps: 1 (ora2pg)
not in testing

libdevel-bt-perl
#721421
claimed by Niko

libgraph-writer-graphviz-perl
#755328: FTBFS again (previous: #711446)
no upstream reaction on previous bug:
    https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=85950
Popcon vote: 4
no rdeps
not in testing

libinline-java-perl
#754755: FTBFS (on various architectures)
unclear upstream ticket:
    https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=98683
Popcon vote: 2
Rdeps: 1 (libxml-saxon-xslt2-perl)
not in testing

libio-event-perl
#730908: FTBFS -- under heavy load?!
upstream activity but no conclusion:
    https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=92200
Popcon vote: 2
Rdeps: 1 (libfile-flock-perl)
not in testing

libjavascript-packer-perl
#711629: FTBFS since 5.18
no upstream reaction: https://github.com/nevesenin/javascript-packer-perl/issues/8
Popcon vote: 7
Rdeps: 1 (webgui)
not in testing

libmakefile-parser-perl
#749357: FTBFS
recent mail by Niko

libnanomsg-raw-perl
#756350: recent FTBFS
Harlan working on it

libnet-bonjour-perl
#755317: FTBFS recently
upstream activity (Net::DNS):
    https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=97361
    https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=97372

libnet-dri-perl
#710954: FTBFS with 5.18
some upstream activity but no fix in sight
Popcon vote: 2
no rdeps
not in testing

libpdl-stats-perl
#752026: FTBFS on arm*
(forwarded upstream right now)
Popcon vote: 2
no rdeps
not in testing

libscalar-number-perl
#708839: FTBFS with 5.18
no upstream reaction: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=85425
Popcon vote: 9
no rdeps
not in testing

libsereal-{en,de}coder-perl
#742409: FTBFS on s390x
upstream actively working on the issues:
    https://github.com/Sereal/Sereal/issues/47

libsocialtext-resting-perl
#710993: FTBFS with 5.18
no upstream reaction: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=81439
Popcon vote: 0
Rdeps: 1 (libsocialtext-resting-utils-perl)
not in testing

libtest-cgi-multipart-perl
#720965: FTBFS with 5.18
no upstream reaction: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=81847
Popcon vote: 0
Rdeps: 1 (libcgi-application-plugin-ajaxupload-perl)
not in testing

libvideo-fourcc-info-perl
#759966: recent FBTFS
not sure if this in in this module or in Package::Stash::PP
no upstream reply so far on
    https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=98474

librdf-helper-perl
#710983: FTBFS with 5.18
newer version in git fails as well
no upstream reaction: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=72636
Popcon vote: 1
no rdeps
not in testing


Let the bug fixing and removal campaign begin :)


Cheers,
gregor


-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Pink Floyd: Signs of Life

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature


Reply to: