On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 20:28:54 -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > > Ok, looks like we need to work out something. Does the ruby package > > need to name the binary /usr/bin/spork? > > I think it's not needed. I was just following the documentation[1] of > that tool. > > Since that tool is only useful for Ruby developers, I think I just can > rename the binary to /usr/bin/ruby-spork and add a README file > explaining why was renamed. Sounds good, thank you! Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Supertramp: Get Your Act Together
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature