On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 19:44:45 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > It is needed on NFS mounts, where the locks are going to be most needed, > as it's easier to get into a situation that several uncoordinate remote > systems are building the same thing in parallel, but those are also not > portably detectable. And unfortunately this is now a Recommends only > due to <http://bugs.debian.org/675947>, as it was causing issues when > introduceing new perl ABI versions. > Does anyone actually do that? (Build packages concurrently from the same build directory on NFS) > > Yes, installing something in a pbuilder/cowbuilder chroot that isn't a > > Build-Depends (or Depends of the base system) is a problem in the sense > > that it somehow defeats the whole purpose of using a chroot for that in > > the first place. :) > > Well, it's still just a warning, would people feel less pestered if it > was a simple info notice? I'd be fine with this immediate compromise > for 1.17.10, and can queue a patch for that right now. > That would be just as annoying, as far as I'm concerned. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature