On 25/02/14 21:28, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:39:56 +0000, Daniel Lintott wrote: > >> Packaging of these isn't going to be a small task due to the number of >> required dependencies. >> >> 1st Batch (required by 2nd batch): >> + Carp - https://metacpan.org/release/Carp >> >> 2nd Batch (required by 3rd batch): >> + IO - https://metacpan.org/release/IO >> + Time-HiRes - https://metacpan.org/release/Time-HiRes >> + Net-IPv6Addr - https://metacpan.org/release/Net-IPv6Addr > > Carp, IO, and Time::HiRes are in perl core (or are newer versions > needed?), Net::IPv6Addr is in libnet-ipv6addr-perl. Ooops.. My mistake on that one! Still getting to grips on exactly what is included in the perl core. Ahh... That's okay... Didn't realise Net::IPv6Addr wasn't in the group. > >> 3rd Batch (required by 4th batch): >> + Net-Frame-Dump - https://metacpan.org/release/Net-Frame-Dump >> + Net-Frame-Layer-ICMPv6 - >> https://metacpan.org/release/Net-Frame-Layer-ICMPv6 >> + Net-Frame-Layer-IPv6 - >> https://metacpan.org/release/Net-Frame-Layer-IPv6 >> + Net-Frame-Simple - https://metacpan.org/release/Net-Frame-Simple >> + Net-Libdnet6 - https://metacpan.org/release/Net-Libdnet6 >> >> 4th Batch: >> + Net-Frame-Device - https://metacpan.org/release/Net-Frame-Device > > The Net::Frame::* modules are indeed not packaged yet ... > >> Before I go ahead and begin packaging all 10 of these I wanted to get >> the groups' opinion on this and whether it would be worthwhile >> proceeding with this for a package that has a relatively low but rising >> popcon [2], but obviously has user interest. > > Hm, no idea, I defer to others :) > I shall await some input from others. On a side note... PET seems to be stuck, haven't seen any changes since this time yesterday Cheers, Daniel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature