On 09/11/2013 06:47 PM, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > There are no hard and fast rules, but in the case of dual-lived modules > we certainly aim to minimise divergence with the separately-packaged > module in cases like this. We are much more likely to apply patches > which are in at least blead upstream than ones which aren't. We're a bit > less conservative than upstream are for maint branches (their maint > policy favours users manually installing newer versions of dual-lived > modules from CPAN whereas that doesn't make so much sense for Debian, > for example). And Niko will correct me here if he disagrees with > anything :) OK, thanks for the explanation! And thanks to you and Niko and carnil for being on top of all of this. It's very much appreciated. --dkg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature