Re: Status of libcrypt-cracklib-perl?
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:50:06 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > > * According to Makefile.PL, the license is 'perl'. This is not
> > > reflected in d/copyright.
> > I thought Artistic License is ment by 'perl' in Makefile.PL
> I think 'perl' means 'Same term as perl', and perl's licensing is
> explained in http://dev.perl.org/licenses/
Cf. also the table at
| Perl | Perl license (use "GPL-1+ or Artistic-1" instead). |
"If your package is released under the same terms as Perl itself, it
should refer to the Artistic and GPL license files in the
So "Artistic or GPL-1+" it is.
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
`- BOFH excuse #148: Insert coin for new game