On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:04:15 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: (Shortening to/cc) > On Mittwoch, 26. September 2012, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > > I am however concerned that the it appears the version of piuparts which > > generates these reports is not yet in sid, and I would like to hold off > > working on it until it is. > The piuparts version in sid (or elsewhere) doesn't matter, the point is your > package is buggy. Seriously buggy even! One can detect this (and suffer by it) > easily without piuparts, so please fix the bug and Absolutely. And I also see Nicholas' point, because not long ago I looked at an (complicated for me) RC bug, and I ended up building a local piuparts package from the develop branch in git. - It just makes a better feeling to say "I could reproduce the problem and I can confirm the fix" than "Hm, I guess my patch fixes it but I'm not sure." So for me it would be helpful to have development releases of piuparts in experimental, if they are used for reporting RC bugs. Maybe I would even offer to do such "maintainer-approved NMUs" if you or Andreas told me "please upload commit 12345 from the develop branch to experimental as version 0.(n+1)~expY" every now and then, if that helped :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Flying Pickets: Masters of war
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature