[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Plans for Catalyst in Wheezy



Hi,

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 03:20:59PM -0600, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> My point is: either we make the tests actually run and see if they
> pass *for real*, or what matters is the clean chroot case. We won't
> package Plack::Middleware::ForceEnv for Wheezy, so I think we can
> ignore this ftbfs-in-corner-case.

I think we can just focus on the clean chroot case because it's unlikely that
we will be able to provide Plack::Middleware::ForceEnv in Wheezy, so I think 
we are good here.

> 
> IMHO: case closed for now.
>

I agree with you.

Now referring to the email draft for the RT [1], I think it should be safe
to add to the plan B the need of 2 more freeze exception for the packages:

- libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl
- libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl (patched by upstream and already in git)

I would prefer to send a single email to the RT rather than separate 
emails since in some way it's a whole development suite.

Kind Regards!
Jotam

1.- http://paste.debian.net/hidden/2e84af3d/

P.S I'm travelling today so it's possible I'll not be able to take a look
    at this for the next 12-14 hours :\ 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: