Hi Charles On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 03:58:19PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 08:05:42PM +0200, intrigeri a écrit : > > gregor herrmann wrote (06 Jul 2012 16:40:20 GMT) : > > > He said we cold ask for a symlink latest->1.0 or similar through the > > > policy and www teams, but I don't think it's worth the hassle. > > > > > So I'm fine with either ... > > > > The benefit for us would be small IMHO, > > so if it had been easy for them, that would have been worth it, > > but given it seems like it's not easy at all, > > I suggest we forget about it -- they probably have, on their plate, > > stuff that would be more useful for the project as a whole. > > Hello everybody, > > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/ is a valid URL, > but would not be a valid value for the Format field. I think that the best > place for an unversionned URL that points at the specification without being > mistaken for a Format URL would be an entry in http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals. We (Gregor and I) talked during DebCamp with David Prévot if there is a easy way from www team to have a URL pointing to the latest copyright-format released. What we want to say is simply that in the Debian Perl Group every package *should* follow latest released copyright-format. Regards, Salvatore
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature