Hi Niko and Dominic On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 06:26:07PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 02:18:16PM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > In general I agree, but there's a mistake in the perl package too: > > libshell-perl shouldn't be broken by perl as it's been deprecated. > > I don't think that's a bug in the perl package: the libshell-perl package > is lagging behind in Debian as it's at 0.72 while CPAN and core have > Shell 0.72_01. > > There's actually a meaningful doc fix in 0.72_01, see > http://search.cpan.org/diff?from=Shell-0.72&to=Shell-0.72_01&w=1 > so Breaks: libshell-perl (<< 0.72.01) seems to be correct and ensures > that the "buggy" 0.72 never overrides the "fixed" 0.72_01. > > The best solution AFAICS would be to upgrade the Debian > package and keep the Breaks entry. Okay, just reading your message, and I have updated the package in the Debian Perl Group repo [1]. Please let me know if we should upload it. Regards, Salvatore
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature