On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:57:38 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> gregor herrmann wrote:
> > So -V adds "perl (>= 5.14.2-6)", and -S adds "perl (>= 5.14.2), perl
> > (<< 5.14.3~)" at the moment.
> Which seems inconsistent, surely -S should not allow an older perl
> version than -V?
Hm.
Not necessarily IMO; the semantics of -S is "satisfy the request of
$somepackage to run with the current perl _upstream_ version (now
5.14.2)", independent of the Debian revision.
For arch:any packages the lower bound will be overridden anyway, and
for arch:all packages it should be fine this way.
But I agree that it looks illogical, or at least aesthetically
unpleasing.
A different approach might be that the new option only adds the upper
bound ("perl (<< $nextversion~)"); for arch:any the minimum version
is added anyway, and arch:all packages could use -V additionally.
(In this case I'd rather name it -N (next) than -S.)
Does this make more sense?
(Anyone else from the pkg-perl group following along?)
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
`- NP: Dire Straits: Ride Across The River
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature