On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:08:39 +0200, intrigeri wrote: > intrigeri+debian@boum.org wrote (14 Sep 2011 16:58:20 GMT) : > > What do you think about applying the patch in Debian, and/or using > > the pkg-perl team super-powers to gently ask upstream about it? > Discussed on IRC, gregoa agreed and proposed to apply the patch after > waiting a few days to see if anyone disagreed. Hence done in Git, > tagged, ready to upload I believe. Please sponsor. Tagging is not a good idea because - the package won't show up at PET's "ready for upload" section [0] - the tag should match what gets uploaded (and is therefore created at upload time) which doesn't work if there are some more changes needed (and according to my still-not-so-good git knowledge removing/re-creating tags is a "bad idea"™) And indeed, there are two minor issues that should be fixed before an upload: - W: libregexp-common-perl source: changelog-should-mention-nmu - W: libregexp-common-perl source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 2011041701-2 -> either add yourself to Uploaders or add "Team upload" to debian/copyright - I: libregexp-common-perl: spelling-error-in-manpage usr/share/man/man3/Regexp::Common.3pm.gz mispelt misspelt -> add to d/p/fix-pod-spelling.patch I guess this needs a -3 revision (and someone who builds it with -v afterwards ...) (TODO also added to d/changelog, as usual) Thanks for your work! gregor [0] http://pet.debian.net/pkg-perl/pet.cgi -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - PGP/GPG key ID: 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Arlo Guthrie: Last To Leave
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature