Le Monday 19 December 2011 12:18:58, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : > Wouldn't a static library package used by all other packages be a better > solution? Bugs would only need to be fixed in one place (and all > packages be rebuilt against the new version). Building a common (I almost say "shared") static library would have the same drawback as building a shared lib: - same compilation options for everyone - no customisation Upstream scintilla does not want scintilla shared libs for the same reason. Given his position, I still thinks that rebuilding scintilla is a bad solution without better affordable alternative. All the best Dominique -- http://config-model.wiki.sourceforge.net/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/ddumont -o- http://ddumont.wordpress.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.