[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

AW: New libsdl-perl will break frozen-bubble, pangzero and dizzy



Hi, we (the SDL_Perl people) started to work on pangzero ages ago. There
just a few issues left.

If this is a blocker we will work on pangzero again. Please let me know.

Cheers, FROGGS

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: pkg-sdl-maintainers-bounces+email=froggs.de@lists.alioth.debian.org
[mailto:pkg-sdl-maintainers-bounces+email=froggs.de@lists.alioth.debian.org]
Im Auftrag von Dominique Dumont
Gesendet: Sonntag, 25. September 2011 16:34
An: debian-devel@lists.debian.org; bdefreese@debian.org
Cc: debian-perl@lists.debian.org;
pkg-sdl-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org;
debian-devel-games@lists.debian.org
Betreff: New libsdl-perl will break frozen-bubble, pangzero and dizzy

Hello

Le Friday 9 September 2011 13:52:06, Sam Hocevar a écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> > SDL perl package [1] is now outdated on Debian. As part of debian-perl
> > team, I'd like to adopt this package to resume its maintenance.
> > 
> > Could any of the listed uploaders give me their blessing ?
> 
>    I'm all OK with it, as long as the reverse dependencies (probably
> just frozen-bubble?) still work. As far as I remember this has been the
> main reason for not updating it.

New libsdl-perl  is ready. I'm going to upload it to experimental. It *will*

break frozen-bubble, pangzero and dizzy

frozen-bubble 2.2.1beta1 is compatible with new libsdl-perl [1]. Should we 
have a new debian release or just patch the current one ? 

mxey is ready to fix dizzy once the new libsdl-perl is available.

I'm only worried by pangzero. Looks dead upstream. Barry, as the last
uploader 
of pangzero, do you think you can patch it for the new libsdl-perl ?

All the best

[1] https://github.com/kthakore/frozen-bubble/blob/master/Changes#L38

Dominique
--
http://config-model.wiki.sourceforge.net/ -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/ddumont     -o- http://ddumont.wordpress.com/


Reply to: