On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 23:10:55 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > This is a shot in the dark but I diff'ed Config.pm and Config_heavy.pl > between armel and armhf rootfs and found that the armhf versions, in > contrast to the armel ones were lacking entries like > /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi and /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi in libpth or > libspath and other variables connected to shared library paths. Could > this be related to my problem? Another shot in the dark: We already had a weird problem with armhf not so long ago: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623350 It should be fixed, but maybe the bug log gives you some hint :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - PGP/GPG key ID: 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Sinéad O'Connor: My Darling Child
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature