Re: CGI::Application
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
There are new releases of CGI::Application and CGI::Application::Dispatch.
Yes I just saw that.
I really think we would be better off with
libcgi-application-basic-plugin-bundle-perl split up into more
manageable pieces.
Agreed.
I would however like to continue my experiment with bundles at least
until we get a clear word from the ftp masters that there is no need.
I propose splitting as follows:
1.) Bundling the various small plugins such as ErrorPage, Forward,
Redirect with libcgi-application-perl itself.
What's the rationale? Only size? I would put them in a bundle of their
own.
2.) Bundling the DevPpopup plugins together.
Agreed.
3.) Obviously we need a transition package for
libcgi-application-basic-plugin-bundle-perl itself.
Well if we split out things like the dev plugins, perhaps, this could
become a rump package for whatever is left.
Also libtitanium-perl will need to be updated to use the new
packages.
4.) Everything else I reckon I can it alone.
Agreed.
This seems to me a very functional organization of the modules.
Go for it.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar@debian.org>
Reply to: