[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#619275: Perl Policy change to document major version upgrade trigger



On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 09:02:53AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Bill
> 
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 08:35:39AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi Bill
> > 
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:25:31PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 08:31:51AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > > Hi Dominic
> > > > 
> > > > Only read trough yet (but not native english speaker):
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 04:35:16PM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  perl-policy.sgml |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/perl-policy.sgml b/perl-policy.sgml
> > > > > index b9f3277..47cf9f6 100644
> > > > > --- a/perl-policy.sgml
> > > > > +++ b/perl-policy.sgml
> > > > > @@ -461,6 +461,26 @@ perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ldopts
> > > > >  	  package must depend upon it explicitly.
> > > > >  	</p>
> > > > >        </sect>
> > > > > +
> > > > > +      <sect id="perl_upgrades">
> > > > > +        <heading>Perl Package Upgrades</heading>
> > > > > +        <p>
> > > > > +          Starting from <package>perl</package> 5.12.3-2, a dpkg trigger
> > > > > +          named <var>perl-major-upgrade</var> will be triggered by the
> > > > > +          postinst of the <package>perl</package> package during major
> > > > > +          upgrades. Some examples of things which consitute a major upgrade
> > > > 
> > > > consitute -> constitute
> > > 
> > > Hello Salvatore,
> > > 
> > > Are you willing to second it ?
> > 
> > Yes, if Niko as maintainer of perl package with Dominic agrees on it
> > too, I would like to second the proposal with the latest patch
> > provided by Dominic (with the spelling fixes).
> > 
> > But I would prefer to hear opinion from Niko to be sure.
> 
> As Niko gave his ok too: I'm seconding the change.

Since there are no more objections and four seconds, I mark this bug as Accepted.
It is commited to the GIT policy repo.

Thanks!

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


Reply to: