Re: Bug#592515: future unblock: nama/1.064-1 (or -2)

[Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org>]

On  0, Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar@43-1.org> wrote:
> 
> I see two possible solutions to include the RC bug fix in Squeeze:
> a) Allow both nama/1.064-1 and the (new) libaudio-ecasound-perl to
> migrate to testing.  However I guess the release team is not happy about
> including new packages at this point.
> b) Preparing a -2 revision of nama that drops the new Recommends and
> allowing it to migrate.
> 

I'd prefer the latter. It would also be nice to document changes in the
changelog files so that ignorant people like me know why that $package
has been recommanded.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy