On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 08:54:13 +0100, TJ wrote: > However my mentor, Paul Wise, has suggested I ask here since Perl Policy > 4.2 suggests package name convention "...for module Foo::Bar is > libfoo-bar-perl." It's more than a suggestion, it's a "should" (i.e. "make it this way unless there are very good reasons to do it differently). > The project uses the Win::Hivex namespace. > That suggests the package name here should be "libwin-hivex-perl", which > doesn't 'feel' correct. Is "libhivex-perl" acceptable? AFAICS the dist name is Win::Hivex and it ships two modules Win::Hivex and Win::Hivex::Registry, so libwin-hivex-perl seems indeed like the logical candidate for the package name in my POV. Why do you think it doesn't "feel" correct? Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG Key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Bob Dylan: Cry A While
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature