Re: Status on libmojolicious-perl ITP?
Thanks, Jonas, for reminding me about that package. What happened was
I had told the upstream people about changes we needed, and I guess
they didn't get around it for awhile. We had version xxx24, this
problem was fixed in xxx25, and the current version is xxx26.
I've updated the package in our repository and it appears good to go.
If, in the future, you wish to take ownership of it/maintain it with
CDBS, feel free to do so. I don't currently have much time to
dedicated to Debian Perl stuff (due to $day_job), though as you can
see I try to make some time here and there.
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 8:08 PM, gregor herrmann <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 18:40:44 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> >>My packaging is on behalf of the Perl team, but one possible
>> >>issue could be that I use CDBS which Jonathan might not favor.
>> >In practice this means that hardly anybody will touch the package,
>> >but that's nothing new and not the first package in this situation :)
>> ...so it seems you do care after all ;-)
> I tried not to, but maybe I did :)
>> It is not the first time I hear the meme of "hardly anyone" using
>> CDBS. That is not my experience, but whatever...
> Just my experience with CDBS packages in the pkg-perl group over the
> last years ...
>> I shall not "infect" the pending libmojolicious-perl package with my
>> weird packaging preference, but just cross my fingers that some
>> ordinary Debian Developer pay some interest in it instead.
> Let's see what Jonathan says; maybe he's happy with the "takeover" or
> has some other informations ...
> .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
> : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
> `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
> `- BOFH excuse #230: Lusers learning curve appears to be fractal
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----