On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:03:40 +0100, Chris Butler wrote: > I noticed that there were a few packages in PET's "Tagged but not in the > archive" section, which were in fact in the archive: Right. > Should we rename the directories in svn to match the source packages, to > stop confusing PET? Or should PET be handling this better? Ehm, no, we have deliberately renamed a couple of source packages so that they are all $source = $binary = libFOO-perl. Some of them are already uploaded, what we are seeing in PET now are the remaining ones. The simplest solution would therefore be to finally upload the remaining packages; of course additionally an improvement in PET wouldn't hurt :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Paul Mc Cartney: Ain't No Sunshine
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature