On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:03:41 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Based on that search, there are still only 20 binary packages in the > archive covered by the Artistic 2.0 license. Thanks for your research! > Given that, this license really isn't common in Debian, and hence doesn't > warrant inclusion in common-licenses. Agreed. > Certainly if the license becomes more broadly used in the > future, it can be proposed for inclusion again at that time. Some clear criterion might be helpful (and save you some time in the future :)) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: U2: With Or Without You
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature