Re: patching package nama
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 07:00:55PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 21:52:23 -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> > > So I guess this package is ready (unless you can think of ideas to
> > > improve the tests (the warnings and the terminal issue).
> > I have a patch to reset the terminal and cleanup the
> > spurious files on exiting the test. However I've failed to
> > build after attempting to patch, both using quilt (I didn't
> > record the error) and patching via svn without quilt.
> Without an error it's difficult to give advices :)
> > Now, I've done svn-upgrade, introducing the patch
> > through a new CPAN tarball.
> Hm, I see there's a 1.062 at CPAN but in our svn repo I only see
> 1.061 both in branches/upstream/nama and trunk/nama.
> And I see a "manually" patched t/12_nama.t which is not good [tm].
> (And now I also get lintian's NMU warning.
> d/changelog: Joel Roth <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> d/control: Joel Roth <email@example.com>
> > I'd appreciate any suggestions of where I should go
> > from here.
> I guess actually svn-upgrading would be a good start :)
I get an error when attempting svn-upgrade:
Could not find the unmodified upstream version in
If you think that
is the upstream source which
svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-perl/trunk/nama is based
Otherwise, please fix the headline of
> .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
> : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
> `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
> `- NP: Beatles