-=| Daniel Kahn Gillmor, Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 02:33:47PM -0500 |=- > On 11/05/2009 11:22 AM, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote: > > The module author may allow compiling/linking/using OpenSSL in addition > > to the GPL. > > hrm. This is true for the smaller case, but then what about other > GPL'ed perl modules that depend on Filter::Crypto::Decrypt? > > Do those modules also need to have the OpenSSL exception in them? How > far does the extension need to reach? I think the answer to this question is "No", but can't remember why :| -- dam
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature