Hi Nathan On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 03:07:11AM +0200, Xavier Oswald wrote: > On 02:48 Tue 09 Jun , Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > >> It is wrong IMO to package the three modules together in a single > > >> binary package, just because that's what upstream did. > > > > > >What do you suggest then if upstream don't want to separate these > > >modules ? > > > > Compose a single source package that produce 3 binary packages. As was > > my understanding was the case already. Your question now confuses me. > > Oh sorry, it was my fault. Agreed that it's wrong to package the three modules > together in a single binary package. I would also support this, to not have them in the same binary package if they haven't to do itself toghether, but also if possible then ask upstream to split them out, if they are not related. Kind regards Salvatore
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature