Re: libacme-bleach-perl: Binary packages
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009, Xavier Oswald wrote:
> On 22:10 Mon 08 Jun , Nathan Handler wrote:
> > I recently packaged libacme-bleach-perl .
> Well, My point of view is that you could ask upstream to do 3 tarballs and
> separate them. And if upstream don't want to do that, keep all 3 modules in one
> package. They are not big so it's not annoying having them shared in one
Especially because we're talking about ACME modules here, there's
little point in separating them out. Just have them all in a single
package which Provides the other three as appropriate. [Furthermore,
these particular ACME modules *are* rather related, as they are all
source parsing modules.]
I'd even question why we're distributing them in the first place...
though they are kind of amusing.
[The] JK-88 [coffee] percolator is capable of acheiving the ultimate
balance of aroma and density, aftertaste and emollience, pentosans and
tannins. The next step is to reduce the cost of the HPLC-E technology
to the point where it can be manufactured for less than the cost of a
-- Charles Stross "Extracts from the Club Diary" in _Toast_ p83-4