Re: libacme-bleach-perl: Binary packages
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009, Xavier Oswald wrote:
> On 22:10 Mon 08 Jun , Nathan Handler wrote:
> > I recently packaged libacme-bleach-perl [1].
>
> Well, My point of view is that you could ask upstream to do 3 tarballs and
> separate them. And if upstream don't want to do that, keep all 3 modules in one
> package. They are not big so it's not annoying having them shared in one
> package.
Especially because we're talking about ACME modules here, there's
little point in separating them out. Just have them all in a single
package which Provides the other three as appropriate. [Furthermore,
these particular ACME modules *are* rather related, as they are all
source parsing modules.]
I'd even question why we're distributing them in the first place...
though they are kind of amusing.
Don Armstrong
--
[The] JK-88 [coffee] percolator is capable of acheiving the ultimate
balance of aroma and density, aftertaste and emollience, pentosans and
tannins. The next step is to reduce the cost of the HPLC-E technology
to the point where it can be manufactured for less than the cost of a
Boeing 757.
-- Charles Stross "Extracts from the Club Diary" in _Toast_ p83-4
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: