[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#421549: I: libbio-primerdesigner-perl source: build-depends-without-arch-dep libmodule-build-perl



gregor herrmann <gregoa@debian.org> writes:

> Hm, the package name is both in the subject and in the lintian output
> above: libbio-primerdesigner-perl :)
>
> (The package is in the pkg-perl svn repo.)

Oh, sorry, I clearly didn't read closely enough.

> I first thought that this is related to dh7's short debian/rules but
> Charles uses the "old style" one with an explicit
>         [ ! -f Build ] || $(PERL) Build --allow_mb_mismatch 1 distclean
> in debian/rules clean target.         
>
> FWIW: I get the same lintian informational message after building the
> package.

Now that I go and look at the code, I remember what's going on here.  We
dropped the allowance and requirement for libmodule-build-perl in 2.1.0.

    + [RA] Stop checking for a libmodule-build-perl build dependency since
      Module::Build now comes with Perl.  Thanks, Raphael Hertzog.
      (Closes: #506697)

Since it comes with Perl, there's little point in having the dependency,
and Lintian was giving spurious tags asking people to add it.

I suppose that we could add it back in as an allowable but not required
dependency if there's some reason not to just drop the dependency
entirely.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


Reply to: