On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:55:58 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > I don't fully understand what you propose. What would be the logic > > that PET should gain? If I read correctly the packages-wip directory > > is used for packages that under PET are shown as WIP anyways... So > > getting rid of it sounds sensible to me > There is an important distinction, IMHO, between what PET sees as > "work in progress" and what we (pkg-ruby-extras) see as -wip: The > later means they are packages which do not affect Debian's QA, as they > have not yet been uploaded for the first time. So they could IMHO be > added as a "first upload pending" category, Nice idea. On the pkg-perl PET page there are quite a few "forgotten" never-uploaded package buried in the 111 WIP packages. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Home: http://info.comodo.priv.at/{,blog/} / GPG Key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux User, Admin, & Developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., Fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Will Oldham: You have cum in your hair and your dick is hanging out
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature