On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:39:29 +0200, Franck Joncourt wrote: > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities > > Should I consider, in a future release, updating the priority field of > libiptables-parse-perl and libiptables-chainmgr-perl from optional to > extra ? in order to avoid conflicts with psad whose priority is set to > optional as well. As the two perl packages have a versioned conflict (because they are now dependencies of psad instead of being inlcuded) I don't think this policy section applies here; in fact psad and libiptables-*-perl must even be installed together. Just my two EUR-cents. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian gnu/linux user, admin & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Flying Pickets: You've Lost That Lovin' Feelin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature