On Tue, 20 May 2008 23:43:52 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: [ Perl-Package-name ] > >> Probably the hard part. Would the most reliable way be to look at the > >> Contents files and convert file names to Perl-Package-names? > > It'd be much easier to look at the debian/watch file and infer from that: > >.. > > This would work for 99% of our packages. But it is still very hackish. > Sure, but there are still perl packages outside pkg-perl and many of > those may not have watch files. I hope that they will be supported by > CPANTS too (to the extent possible). dh-make-perl also has it's algorithm (by parsing Makefile.PL and META.yml) but that needs a source package, so for packages outside of pkg-perl Homepage: and or/debian watch are probably more useful. Hm, maybe even re-translating libfoo-bar-perl to Foo::Bar would catch most packages/modules. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian gnu/linux user, admin & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: The Eagles: The Long Run
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature