-=| Martín Ferrari, Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:06:27AM -0300 |=- > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:55, Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org> wrote: > > > There is an important distinction, IMHO, between what PET sees as > > "work in progress" and what we (pkg-ruby-extras) see as -wip: The > > later means they are packages which do not affect Debian's QA, as they > > have not yet been uploaded for the first time. So they could IMHO be > > added as a "first upload pending" category, or something like that, > > mainly to keep them under the radar and so that the group does not > > forget about them just because the ITPer has forgotten (or in any > > case, somebody can resume ITP work). > > Ah, yes, it's a good idea and can be done almost trivially. for > example with the just commited revision 616 :) Cool. Tincho++ :) Now it appears we have *35* packages that were never uploaded in the Perl group. Please take a look at the list[1] and place the mouse over the version in the 'Repository' column. If you see your name in it, please make that 35 number lower :) (or place appropriate note in the changelog if not present already) [1] http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi TIA -- dam JabberID: dam@jabber.minus273.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature