-=| Martín Ferrari, Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:06:27AM -0300 |=-
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:55, Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org> wrote:
>
> > There is an important distinction, IMHO, between what PET sees as
> > "work in progress" and what we (pkg-ruby-extras) see as -wip: The
> > later means they are packages which do not affect Debian's QA, as they
> > have not yet been uploaded for the first time. So they could IMHO be
> > added as a "first upload pending" category, or something like that,
> > mainly to keep them under the radar and so that the group does not
> > forget about them just because the ITPer has forgotten (or in any
> > case, somebody can resume ITP work).
>
> Ah, yes, it's a good idea and can be done almost trivially. for
> example with the just commited revision 616 :)
Cool. Tincho++ :)
Now it appears we have *35* packages that were never uploaded in the
Perl group. Please take a look at the list[1] and place the mouse over
the version in the 'Repository' column. If you see your name in it,
please make that 35 number lower :) (or place appropriate note in the
changelog if not present already)
[1] http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi
TIA
--
dam JabberID: dam@jabber.minus273.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature