On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:55:58 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > I don't fully understand what you propose. What would be the logic
> > that PET should gain? If I read correctly the packages-wip directory
> > is used for packages that under PET are shown as WIP anyways... So
> > getting rid of it sounds sensible to me
> There is an important distinction, IMHO, between what PET sees as
> "work in progress" and what we (pkg-ruby-extras) see as -wip: The
> later means they are packages which do not affect Debian's QA, as they
> have not yet been uploaded for the first time. So they could IMHO be
> added as a "first upload pending" category,
Nice idea. On the pkg-perl PET page there are quite a few "forgotten"
never-uploaded package buried in the 111 WIP packages.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Home: http://info.comodo.priv.at/{,blog/} / GPG Key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux User, Admin, & Developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., Fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/
`- NP: Will Oldham: You have cum in your hair and your dick is hanging out
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature