On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 05:24:42PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > -=| Peter Pentchev, Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:57:15PM +0300 |=- > > I actually sent this a couple of days ago, but only to the list; > > maybe you didn't notice it, since you actually uploaded the package > > a couple of hours later, with a doubled Uploaders entry :) > > Thanks again for the catch. I am not subscribed to -commits as I > follow them on IRC :) > > I think the Reply-To of the -commits (and pkg-perl-maintainers?) is > better set to debian-perl@l.d.o (Cc-ed), which is used for general > discussion. For -commits, maybe. For -maintainers, I'm not sure it would be a good idea - what about automated mails from the BTS? If someone replies to the initial bug report and ignores the BTS-set "From" and "Cc", then the original submitter shall not see the response, and it won't be tracked in the BTS, either. > Now if someone can handle me the mailman password(s) of these... Can't help you there, sorry :) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@cnsys.bg roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 I am not the subject of this sentence.
Attachment:
pgpXp7j35hdGy.pgp
Description: PGP signature