On Mon, 12 May 2008 15:39:19 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > > Hi, with a huge number of reverse build-dependencies, I think this needs a better > > plan. > As for building, perl-modules is currently always installed because > dpkg-dev is build-essential and pulls it in. It's not build-essential > itself, though. > > Conclusion: everything should Just Work (tm), but there's an argument > for requiring build dependencies on 'perl-modules (>= 5.10.0)' for > these. Possibly even 'perl-modules (>= 5.10.0) | libversion-perl' to > ease backporting, but that's mostly cosmetics as at least sbuild won't > look at the alternative anyway. Hm, I guess as long as perl-modules is not build-essential we have to use 'perl-modules (>= 5.10.0) | libversion-perl' for policy compliance (and being nice to backporters). Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian gnu/linux user, admin & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: John Zorn & Masada: Tohorot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature