-=| gregor herrmann, Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 05:33:21PM +0100 |=- > On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:45:03 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > > > Which reminds me that we still haven't finished the revert of the > > > relating changes to policy.pod and subversion.pod (where DM was > > > introduced and Uploaders redefined). > > > Without having looked into it I guess a bit more than a simple revert > > > of the commits might be helpful; any takers? > > Please go ahead and > > Why did I expect that reply? :) Yeah, sorry for not taking more acive role in this. I really should, as I was the one pus hing for the changes (that we're reverting now) in the first place :/ > I've now prepared (and committed as policy.draft) a draft that > removes the DM parts (except for a short note), changes the meaning > of Uploaders back (with a slight twist to "significant > modifications") and keeps the rest of the improvements. > > Find below the diff between policy.pod and policy.draft. Thanks for preparing this. I agree with your changes, with one question: > +The Debian project has adopted the Debian Maintainers (DM) concept (cf. > +L<http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_003>) in Summer 2007. The pkg-perl group > +doesn't see this approach fit for its workflow and is not actively using > +it. How strong is that meant? DM (the concept) forbidden, discouraged, is decided on a case-by-case basis (how?)? -- dam JabberID: dam@jabber.minus273.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature