On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 07:54:25PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:12:29 +0000, Julian Mehnle wrote: > > > > I'm not really sure if this is really a matter of policy, but if > > > others find it useful I'm happy to write a short paragraph mentioning > > > that and why a watchfile is useful and writing down the proposed > > > pattern. > > Well, not that I think this actually needs to be policy, but if we go out > > of our way to adjust all our packages to match a single scheme, then how > > can it not be considered policy? > > It could be considered "best practice to make our lives easier" :) > > Anyway, mentioning watch files in policy is no error I guess. Here > goes the first proposal: Sounds great! Just a minor nit... > --- policy.pod.orig 2008-01-07 19:34:05.000000000 +0100 > +++ policy.pod 2008-01-07 19:51:51.000000000 +0100 [snip] > +(Scanning the distribution based CPAN URLs is usually much faster than Shouldn't this be "distribution-based" with a dash? G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If wishes were fishes, the antecedent of this conditional would be true.
Description: PGP signature